When it comes to turning a design into a physical plastic part, there’s no one-size-fits-all manufacturing process. Two of the most commonly used methods in prototyping and production are Vacuum Casting vs Injection Molding. Although both processes can create high-quality plastic parts, their ideal use cases, costs, limitations, and capabilities are very different.

In this guide, we’ll break down how each process works, compare them across every key metric, and help you decide which one is right for your project.

What is Vacuum Casting?

Vacuum casting is a manufacturing method that produces plastic parts by pouring liquid resin into a flexible silicone mould under vacuum pressure. The vacuum ensures that air bubbles are eliminated and that the resin fills every detail of the mould accurately.

This technique is especially common for:

• Rapid prototyping

• Small production runs

• Aesthetic or functional prototypes that mimic final materials

Vacuum casting is quick and cost-effective for early stages of design validation because it doesn’t require expensive tooling.

What is Injection Molding?

Injection molding involves injecting molten plastic into a rigid metal mould (usually steel or aluminum) under high pressure. Once the plastic cools and hardens, the mould opens and ejects a finished part.

This process is widely used for mass production because it delivers:

• Fast production rates

• High precision and repeatability

• Low cost per unit when producing large volumes

Injection molding supports a broad range of engineering plastics used in durable consumer, industrial, and automotive products.

Key Differences Between Vacuum Casting Vs Injection Molding

Vacuum Casting Vs Injection Molding Tooling and Setup Cost

Vacuum Casting

• Uses silicone moulds, which are inexpensive and faster to produce.

• Typical lead time for mould creation is just a few days.

• Ideal for low budgets and quick turnaround prototypes.

Injection Molding

• Requires high-precision metal moulds that are expensive and take weeks or months to fabricate.

• Initial tooling cost can range from several thousand to tens of thousands of dollars.

• Best for projects where high volume justifies the upfront investment.

Summary: Vacuum casting wins on low initial cost and speed, while injection molding requires a big upfront investment but becomes economical over high volumes.

Vacuum Casting Vs Injection Molding Production Volume and Speed

Vacuum Casting

Because silicone moulds wear out quickly (often around 20–30 parts before replacement), this process is best for small to medium production runs typically up to a few hundred pieces.

Cycle times per part are longer (each part is cast individually), and overall daily output is limited compared to injection molding.

Injection Molding

Designed for high-volume manufacturing, with automated injection moulding machine producing parts in seconds. Injection molds can deliver thousands of parts per day, making this approach ideal for large production runs and mass manufacturing.

Summary: If you need hundreds of parts, vacuum casting can work. If you need thousands or more, injection molding is far more efficient.

Vacuum Casting Vs Injection Molding Material Options

The materials you can use have a big impact on part performance:

Vacuum Casting Materials

Primarily uses polyurethane resins, which can mimic the properties of many plastics, including flexible, rigid, and transparent resins. However, these materials generally don’t match the strength and thermal performance of injection-moldable plastics.

Injection Molding Materials

Supports a wide range of engineering thermoplastics like ABS, polypropylene, polycarbonate, nylon, and more. These plastics deliver excellent mechanical properties such as impact resistance, stiffness, and heat tolerance.

Summary: Injection molding offers a broader and higher-performance selection of materials.

Vacuum Casting Vs Injection Molding Precision, Tolerances & Surface Quality

Vacuum Casting

Produces good surface finishes suitable for prototypes and visual parts. However, dimensional tolerances are typically looser and less consistent compared to injection molding.

Injection Molding

Delivers excellent dimensional accuracy and repeatability due to the stability and precision of metal moulds. Tolerances are tight, which is crucial for parts that must fit precisely in assemblies.

Summary: Injection molding is superior when tight tolerances and precision are required.

Vacuum Casting Vs Injection Molding Design Flexibility and Iteration

Vacuum Casting

Its low tooling cost and quicker setup make iterative design easier. If you need to refine a part design multiple times, vacuum casting lets you update silicone moulds relatively cheaply.

Injection Molding

Design changes after tooling are expensive and time-consuming, as each modification may require new or altered metal moulds.

Summary: Vacuum casting is more flexible for frequent design iterations, while injection molding favors finalized designs.

Vacuum Casting Vs Injection Molding Durability & Lifespan

Vacuum Casting

Silicone moulds degrade quickly often after just a few dozen parts which limits their usefulness for larger batches.

Injection Molding

Metal moulds can last hundreds of thousands to millions of cycles without losing quality, making this method ideal for long-term, high-volume manufacturing.

Cost Comparison by Volume

At very low volumes (like prototypes or small limited batches), vacuum casting is often cheaper because of the low tooling cost. But as production volume increases, injection molding becomes far more cost-effective due to its low per-part cost and durable tooling.

When to Use Each Method

Use Vacuum Casting When:

• You need prototypes or small batches.

• The budget is limited.

• Design changes are likely.

• Fast turnaround is important.

Use Injection Molding When:

• You plan to produce large volumes.

• Tight tolerances and high mechanical strength are required.

• You need a wide range of material properties.

FAQs

Can vacuum casting replace injection molding?

No. Vacuum casting is ideal for prototypes and low-volume production, but it doesn’t match the precision, material strength, or cost efficiency of injection molding for large-scale manufacturing.

How many parts can one vacuum casting mould make?

Silicone moulds typically last for about 20–30 parts before they need to be replaced due to wear.

Which process is better for producing consumer products?

For mass-produced consumer products where durability, precision, and low unit cost matter, injection molding is almost always the better choice.

Is injection molding expensive?

The initial mould and tooling for injection molding are expensive, but the per-part cost drops rapidly once production volume is high enough.

Can vacuum casting mimic the look of final production parts?

Yes vacuum casting resins can be formulated to closely resemble production plastics in texture, color, and some mechanical properties, making it excellent for prototypes and visual samples.

Both technologies are valuable tools in product development and manufacturing. Understanding their differences ensures that you choose the right process for your project goals whether that’s testing a concept or producing thousands of high-quality, durable parts.

For 3D printing projects, quotes and more information visit KAD 3D