FDM vs MJF: A Complete Comparison

3D printing has rapidly evolved, and two technologies FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) and MJF (Multi Jet Fusion) stand out for producing strong, functional parts. Whether you’re picking a machine for your business or simply trying to understand the difference between FDM vs MJF, this guide explains everything clearly: print quality, strength, speed, cost, materials, workflow, surface finish, and real-world applications.

This detailed comparison will help you decide which one fits your needs best.

What is FDM 3D Printing?

FDM 3D printing, also known as FFF (Fused Filament Fabrication), is one of the most common and beginner-friendly 3D printing technology. It uses solid thermoplastic filament like PLA, PETG, ABS, or Nylon which is melted and extruded layer by layer.

Think of it as a controlled, ultra-precise hot glue gun that draws your part one layer at a time.

How FDM Works

• A spool of filament (PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU, Nylon, etc.) is heated in a nozzle.

• The printer extrudes melted plastic layer-by-layer.

• The material cools, hardens, and builds the final shape.

Advantages of FDM

• Very affordable materials

• Large build volumes available

• Good mechanical strength (varies with filament type)

• Great for functional parts, jigs, fixtures, and prototypes

• Easy workflow with minimal post-processing

Limitations of FDM

• Visible layer lines

• Lower detail compared to resin or MJF

• Mechanical strength depends on layer bonding

• Dimensional accuracy can vary

FDM is ideal for functional prototypes, engineering parts, large objects, and low-cost production.

What is MJF 3D Printing?

MJF 3D printing is an industrial 3D printing technology developed by HP. It uses powder-based Nylon material, which is fused by an infrared lamp after being coated with fusing agents. Unlike FDM, MJF does not extrude material instead, it fuses entire layers at once.

This allows it to produce highly accurate, strong, and repeatable parts ideal for manufacturing.

How MJF Works

• A thin layer of Nylon powder (usually PA12 or PA11) is spread on the print bed.

• A printhead jets fusing & detailing agents onto the powder.

• An infrared lamp passes over, solidifying only the jetted regions.

• The process repeats layer-by-layer until the part is complete.

Advantages of MJF

• Excellent strength and isotropic mechanical properties

• Highly accurate and consistent professional results

• Smooth, uniform surface with minimal layer visibility

• Ideal for batch production and functional components

• No support structures needed

Limitations of MJF

• Machines and materials are expensive

• Requires powder-handling equipment

• Limited material options (mostly Nylon-based)

• Post-processing (depowdering) required

FDM vs MJF 3D Printing: Detailed Comparison

Looking to understand MJF vs FDM more clearly? Here’s a deep breakdown covering quality, strength, speed, materials, and applications so you can choose the right technology for your needs.

Print Quality: FDM vs MJF

FDM 3D Printing Quality

• Prints thermoplastic filaments layer-by-layer

• Visible layer lines are common

• Good for general prototypes

• Struggles with very fine details

• Surface quality depends heavily on calibration

MJF 3D Printing Quality

• Uses powder fused by an infrared lamp

• Much smoother surface finish than FDM

• Excellent detail and dimensional precision

• Professional-grade accuracy suitable for end-use parts

• Isotropic strength (almost equal in all directions)

Print Strength: MJF vs FDM

FDM Strength

• Strength depends on filament type and layer adhesion

• PLA = rigid but brittle

• PETG = tough and impact-resistant

• ABS/ASA = durable & heat-resistant

• Nylon / CF-Nylon = strongest FDM filaments

• Weakest point: layer separation under stress

MJF Strength

• Uses Nylon powder (PA12, PA11)

• Exceptional tensile & impact strength

• Strong in all directions (isotropic)

• Ideal for real-world mechanical parts

• More durable than SLA and often stronger than standard FDM

Print Speed: FDM vs MJF

FDM Speed

• Faster for single large objects

• Slower for small detailed prints

• Complex geometry increases print time

MJF Speed

• Prints entire layers at once

• Print time does NOT change with complexity

• Extremely fast for batch production

Material Options: FDM vs MJF

FDM Materials

• PLA, PETG, ABS, ASA

• TPU (flexible)

• Nylon

• Carbon fiber composites

• Wood-filled, metal-filled, glitter, etc.

Extremely diverse and budget-friendly options.

MJF Materials

• Primarily Nylon PA12 (standard)

• PA11 for higher flexibility

• Glass-filled (PA12 GF)

• TPU (in some MJF systems)

• Industrial-grade powders

Material variety is limited but very high performance.

FDM vs MJF Surface Finish

FDM

• Visible layer lines

• Rougher surfaces

• May require sanding, filing, or smoothing

MJF

• Smooth, uniform surfaces

• Almost no visible layers

• Light post-processing needed (bead blasting, dyeing)

FDM vs MJF for Miniatures & Detailed Models

MJF for Miniatures

• Clean surfaces

• Excellent accuracy

• Handles small details well

• Very durable for handling/production

FDM for Miniatures

• Visible lines reduce clarity

• Not ideal for tiny details

• Better for large props or display pieces

FDM vs MJF for Business & Industrial Uses

Choose FDM If You Need:

• Low-cost prototypes

• Large functional parts

• Budget-friendly production

• Simple engineering applications

• Material experimentation

Choose MJF If You Need:

• End-use manufacturing

• High-strength functional parts

• Batch production

• Industrial-grade accuracy

• Consistent mechanical performance

FDM vs MJF: Full Technology Overview

FDM

• How it works: Melts filament and extrudes it layer-by-layer.
• Strengths: Affordable, large prints, wide material choices.
• Cost & Size: Low material cost, cheap machines.
• Limitations: Visible layer lines, lower precision.

MJF

• How it works: Uses powder + fusing agent + infrared lamp.
• Strengths: Strong, accurate, fast, industrial-grade parts.
• Cost & Size: Expensive machines but great for production.
• Limitations: Limited materials, powder handling required.

FDM vs MJF: Side-by-Side Comparison

FAQs

Which is better FDM or MJF ?

The best choice depends on your needs. MJF produces stronger, smoother, and more accurate parts, making it ideal for end-use manufacturing and engineering applications. FDM is cheaper and great for prototypes, hobby printing, and large objects.

Is MJF stronger than FDM?

In most cases, MJF Nylon prints are stronger, more durable, and more isotropic than standard FDM filaments. Even strong FDM materials like Nylon or PETG cannot match the consistency of MJF.

Is MJF more expensive than FDM?

Yes, due to industrial machines, powder 3D printing materials, and post-processing. FDM is significantly more affordable for beginners and small workshops.

For 3D printing projects, quotes and more information visit KAD 3D